<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Prescriptive grammar?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wordlily.com/2007/06/05/prescriptive-grammar/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wordlily.com/2007/06/05/prescriptive-grammar/</link>
	<description>For the love of language (and some fiber arts, too)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 May 2012 12:29:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: wordlily</title>
		<link>http://wordlily.com/2007/06/05/prescriptive-grammar/#comment-449</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[wordlily]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 16:04:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wordlily.wordpress.com/2007/06/05/prescriptive-grammar/#comment-449</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yeah, I know you&#039;re a fan of using all the commas in a series list. I thought, though, that the final comma (before the &quot;and&quot;) WAS the serial comma — this Wikepedia entry http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Serial_comma backs that up. Needless to say, that&#039;s the comma I was talking about in this entry. I tried to clarify, and meant to go back and actually define it before posting, but I didn&#039;t.

I enjoy the conversations, too. 

I think the biggest argument against the serial comma (unless needed for clarity&#039;s sake) is conciseness. Journalists are well-known for trying to squeeze stories onto less paper, using less ink — all to save money. I&#039;m a big fan of economizing.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I know you&#8217;re a fan of using all the commas in a series list. I thought, though, that the final comma (before the &#8220;and&#8221;) WAS the serial comma — this Wikepedia entry <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Serial_comma" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Serial_comma</a> backs that up. Needless to say, that&#8217;s the comma I was talking about in this entry. I tried to clarify, and meant to go back and actually define it before posting, but I didn&#8217;t.</p>
<p>I enjoy the conversations, too. </p>
<p>I think the biggest argument against the serial comma (unless needed for clarity&#8217;s sake) is conciseness. Journalists are well-known for trying to squeeze stories onto less paper, using less ink — all to save money. I&#8217;m a big fan of economizing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mrschili</title>
		<link>http://wordlily.com/2007/06/05/prescriptive-grammar/#comment-448</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mrschili]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 15:08:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wordlily.wordpress.com/2007/06/05/prescriptive-grammar/#comment-448</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[LILY!  This is great!  You&#039;ve hit on a lot of the issues that prescriptivists will argue, and you&#039;ve done a good job of explaining them, too.  Thanks for leaving this link on my blog; I really love having full-blown conversations about this sort of thing.

(Oh, and as an aside, I ALWAYS use the serial comma.  Not only that, but I use the final comma before the &quot;and,&quot; too.  I learned that way, it makes sense to me (and doesn&#039;t seem to confuse anyone), and I&#039;m sticking to it!)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LILY!  This is great!  You&#8217;ve hit on a lot of the issues that prescriptivists will argue, and you&#8217;ve done a good job of explaining them, too.  Thanks for leaving this link on my blog; I really love having full-blown conversations about this sort of thing.</p>
<p>(Oh, and as an aside, I ALWAYS use the serial comma.  Not only that, but I use the final comma before the &#8220;and,&#8221; too.  I learned that way, it makes sense to me (and doesn&#8217;t seem to confuse anyone), and I&#8217;m sticking to it!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

