<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The printed word is dead?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wordlily.com/2007/11/21/the-written-word-is-dead/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wordlily.com/2007/11/21/the-written-word-is-dead/</link>
	<description>For the love of language (and some fiber arts, too)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 May 2012 12:29:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: wordlily</title>
		<link>http://wordlily.com/2007/11/21/the-written-word-is-dead/#comment-1125</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[wordlily]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2007 19:29:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wordlily.wordpress.com/2007/11/21/the-written-word-is-dead/#comment-1125</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So, Idetrorce, you&#039;re saying that print IS dead?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, Idetrorce, you&#8217;re saying that print IS dead?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Idetrorce</title>
		<link>http://wordlily.com/2007/11/21/the-written-word-is-dead/#comment-1123</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Idetrorce]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2007 16:53:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wordlily.wordpress.com/2007/11/21/the-written-word-is-dead/#comment-1123</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[very interesting, but I don&#039;t agree with you 
Idetrorce]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>very interesting, but I don&#8217;t agree with you<br />
Idetrorce</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wordlily</title>
		<link>http://wordlily.com/2007/11/21/the-written-word-is-dead/#comment-1100</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[wordlily]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 22:21:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wordlily.wordpress.com/2007/11/21/the-written-word-is-dead/#comment-1100</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, good to know! I know it hasn&#039;t been up for long; I last searched for it in the first 2-3 weeks after it opened, and it wasn&#039;t anywhere to be found.

Newspapers, as I&#039;ve stated in the past, are in some ways begging to be replaced in peoples&#039; days. Still, it&#039;s a ways off, at least on the local level. And yes, you may be right that it&#039;s because small towns don&#039;t accept new technology easily.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, good to know! I know it hasn&#8217;t been up for long; I last searched for it in the first 2-3 weeks after it opened, and it wasn&#8217;t anywhere to be found.</p>
<p>Newspapers, as I&#8217;ve stated in the past, are in some ways begging to be replaced in peoples&#8217; days. Still, it&#8217;s a ways off, at least on the local level. And yes, you may be right that it&#8217;s because small towns don&#8217;t accept new technology easily.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Warren</title>
		<link>http://wordlily.com/2007/11/21/the-written-word-is-dead/#comment-1099</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian Warren]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 22:11:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wordlily.wordpress.com/2007/11/21/the-written-word-is-dead/#comment-1099</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree that print is long from dead, especially at the book level. Books are timeless. Newspapers are everything but timeless, destined to become outdated as soon as possible. I think local news is only found in print because local newspapers (and small towns) are slow to adopt new forms of technology. Here in Denver, it&#039;s a slightly different story. I can get tons of news about denver online. If I want news about Edgewater, our small town (smaller than Siloam) just a mile from Denver, it&#039;s a bit harder. We don&#039;t even have a newspaper.

Your movie showtimes thought is inaccurate. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/search?q=showtimes%2072761&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Google showtimes 72761&lt;/a&gt; and you&#039;ll get showtimes for Siloam Springs. And &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.centercinemas.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this&lt;/a&gt; is is the cimema&#039;s &quot;website&quot;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that print is long from dead, especially at the book level. Books are timeless. Newspapers are everything but timeless, destined to become outdated as soon as possible. I think local news is only found in print because local newspapers (and small towns) are slow to adopt new forms of technology. Here in Denver, it&#8217;s a slightly different story. I can get tons of news about denver online. If I want news about Edgewater, our small town (smaller than Siloam) just a mile from Denver, it&#8217;s a bit harder. We don&#8217;t even have a newspaper.</p>
<p>Your movie showtimes thought is inaccurate. <a href="http://www.google.com/search?q=showtimes%2072761" rel="nofollow">Google showtimes 72761</a> and you&#8217;ll get showtimes for Siloam Springs. And <a href="http://www.centercinemas.com/" rel="nofollow">this</a> is is the cimema&#8217;s &#8220;website&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

