![]()
I finished reading Volume 1 of the Kristin Lavransdatter trilogy (The Bridal Wreath) by Sigrid Undset this morning. The trilogy is on the list of 100 books that I’m slowly making my way through.
As I conveyed to my father, aside from being on the above list that I’ve come to respect, the books are set in Scandinavia, by a Scandinavian author, and Undset was awarded a Nobel Prize in Literature in 1928 primarily based on these books. What’s not to like?
Per Wikipedia, I read the poorer translation. Charles Archer first translated the trilogy into English in 1927, and it’s never been out of print since then. This is the version I picked up with a bit of Christmas money. Tiina Nunnally released a new translation in 2006, which critics apparently like better. I really liked how the language (in the translation I read) fit the story; I don’t really think that should be a basis for disliking this translation. However, I haven’t read the more modern translation, either.
I was slow to get caught up in this book: It was daunting to find three endnotes on the first page of the novel! Once I got past that, however, it was a fun, quick read with deep meaning.
Now off to start the second volume, The Wife!









4 comments
Comments feed for this article
April 9, 2008 at 11:59 am
Kristin Lavransdatter II: The Mistress of Husaby by Sigrid Undset « Word Lily
[...] mentioned the translation last time, but I want to add here: I’ve quite enjoyed the language in these books. It helps set the [...]
October 6, 2008 at 6:31 pm
Kristin Lavransdatter III: The Cross by Sigrid Undset « Word Lily
[...] is my post on the first volume, The Bridal Wreath, and here’s my post about the second volume, The [...]
July 1, 2009 at 12:15 pm
Mindy Withrow » Kristin Lavransdatter
[...] Superfast Reader (by volume — The Wreath, The Wife, The Cross) WordLily (by volume — The Wreath, The Wife, The Cross) [...]
July 2, 2009 at 9:58 am
Mindy Withrow
Thanks for sharing the links to your 3 KRISTIN reviews! I’ve added them to my “elsewhere on the web” list at the close of my own brief review (http://mindywithrow.com/?p=1011). I haven’t read the Archer translation, so I can’t compare the language, but I loved the Nunnally one and I heard that it restored several scenes that had been deleted by Archer — so perhaps that is another (better?) reason the critics liked it. Anyway, off to check out some of your more recent reviews!