As book reviewing becomes more and more the purview of book bloggers (as newspapers fade away, taking their book sections along into the mist), it’s important to consider what reviews must have, what it’s nice to find, and what’s over the top.
So-called professional reviews (so defined, I suppose, because the reviewer is getting paid to write an unbiased, expert review), as found in these standalone book sections of yore, are long. Very long. I think it essential that book bloggers’ reviews not be automatically held to this standard — at least not unthinkingly. Because of the simple fact that bloggers’ reviews are read on-screen, they should be shorter than the massive critiques of yesteryear. Frankly, even on paper, some of those reviews are still too long for my taste.
This article by Michelle Kerns, Book Examiner, lists factors she believes every book review should include.
You should go read it, it’s well-written and a challenge to reviewers of all stripes (and to consumers of reviews, as well). It’s sparked a conversation. For discussion purposes, I’m including here the crux of Kerns’s piece:
The Book Examiner Book Review format:
- The genre(s) this book fits most comfortably within
- The basic plot
- How does this author write? (this should include at least one representative sample) Whose writing is it most similar to?
- What feel does the book have?
- What worked magnificently
- What failed miserably
- How does it compare to other books within the same genre(s)?
- How does it compare to the author’s other books?
- What books are most similar to this book?
- If you like this book, you will probably like …
- If you hate this book, you will probably like …
- What to drink while reading this book (you knew I couldn’t leave this out)
It’s obvious to me that some of these pieces are essential. Others certainly add value, while others are generally unnecessary and may merely contribute to undesirable length. Before delving too far into this, though, let’s look at another list, posted (within one day of the first list, although without the blogger’s knowledge of the first) by Chris at book-a-rama:
How to Write a Review from a Very Amateur Book Blogger
- Make sure you mention the title and author’s name in the title and body of the post. Don’t rely on a book cover picture. This is important not only to readers but for Google spiderbots that look for content. You want your review to be found.
- Describe the book briefly. Some bloggers cut and paste from the book jacket. You might choose this route too but I think it’s a good writing exercise to do it yourself. I also think it helps me focus before I give my opinion. Avoid spoilers.
- Opinion: Find your voice. Blogs are personal and your readers want a sense of the person behind the blog. When you give your opinion, give it in your own style. Is this hard for you? Here’s a trick: pretend your BFF, Mom, spouse, etc., has asked, “Why did you like this book?” What would you say? How would you say it? Think of this question and start writing stream-of-conscious style. Don’t think too hard and don’t worry about grammar. Read what you wrote. Pick your best comments and expand on those ideas.
- Opinion: What’s the story, Morning Glory? How did you feel about the plot? The characters? Were they relatable? Believable? How was the pacing? Did the story drag? Or could you not put it down? Is the writer a great storyteller? Or was it so-so?
- The technical details. This is optional but I like it. Tell us about the writing itself. Whose point of view was the told from? What is the writing style? Did it work? Were there a lot of grammatical errors? A lack of punctuation? Did this work as a writing device or was it distracting? How about the atmosphere — dark, funny, etc.?
- Balance. Try to balance your reviews with both the good and bad. Most books have something good about them. Someone else might like what you didn’t. However, if it just wasn’t for you, say so.
- Watch your grammar. I’ve made many mistakes, believe me, and will continue to but I do try to catch as many grammatical errors as I can. If you have spell check, use it. Mistakes distract the reader. Try to avoid it.
- To thine own self be true. This is kind of like finding you voice but encompasses your whole blog. Be honest in your opinions. Your readers will appreciate it. No one will die if you didn’t like Twilight. Be yourself. You have to be able to stand behind what you write. You might like to make an About Me page to clarify your review policies.
- Ratings? I gave up on rating books because I gave everything a 4 star rating. If you choose to have one, give an explanation of your system somewhere on your blog.
- Just write! Not everything you write will be gold. When you look back on your blog there will be some reviews you’re really proud of and maybe some you’ll wonder if you wrote at all! That’s okay. Just do it!
Actually, these two lists have a lot of similarities. Here’s the deal. I love that we as bloggers (humans, even) are all unique. I don’t think it’s to anyone’s lasting benefit for all book reviews to be written the same way. It’s great to have a unique style, voice, etc.
For my thoughts here, I’m color-coding the items from the two above lists. These are not set in stone, and I’m not ready to sign a contract that I’ll abide by this myself even, but here goes:
GREEN = Things all book reviews must have
AMBER = Things that add value to a book review, but aren’t essential
RED = Things that might be nice once in a while but could just be making a review too long
(Get it? It’s like a stoplight.)
Word Lily’s Stoplight Guide to Book Reviews
- Title, author, basic plot synopsis
- Reviewer’s opinion of the book
- As far as how the book compares to others of its genre or by the same author, this is good information. However, the way the items are worded seems to require that the reviewer has read all of the other books in the universe.
- If you like this book, you will probably like … and If you hate this book, you will probably like …
I also have taken to including the publisher, page count, and publication year.
This should at least go beyond “I liked it” or “I didn’t like it,” to include some discussion of the book’s feel, writing, plot, characters, perhaps.
What I liked, and what I didn’t like.
It’s also not necessary information.
There’s also a good conversation about the initial list at Callista’s blog.
So what do you think? Agree, disagree?
If none of this provokes thought for you (or maybe you just need something to laugh at?), perhaps you’ll enjoy Kerns’s top 20 most annoying book reviewer cliches list.